Wool and Mohair Programs in 1st District of Nebraska (Rep. Jeff Fortenberry), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 152
Recipients of Wool and Mohair Programs from farms in 1st District of Nebraska (Rep. Jeff Fortenberry) totaled $63,323 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wool and Mohair Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | James R Rieken | Tekamah, NE 68061 | $77 |
102 | Kim Knobbe | Dodge, NE 68633 | $76 |
103 | Ralph Woerman | Oakland, NE 68045 | $75 |
104 | Gerald J Prochaska | David City, NE 68632 | $73 |
105 | Angela M Mandel Life Use | Dodge, NE 68633 | $69 |
106 | Donald R Meyer Life Use | Oakland, NE 68045 | $68 |
107 | Orville Meyer | West Point, NE 68788 | $68 |
108 | Kenneth M Goff | Schuyler, NE 68036 | $64 |
109 | Nathan A Panko | Tekamah, NE 68061 | $63 |
110 | Gary Stander | Louisville, NE 68037 | $63 |
111 | Nancy Ann Hartman | Bellwood, NE 68624 | $61 |
112 | David Mandel | West Point, NE 68788 | $59 |
113 | Bruce Adam Kraeger | Plattsmouth, NE 68048 | $58 |
114 | Joseph T Kopecky | David City, NE 68632 | $57 |
115 | Dale Donnelly | Tekamah, NE 68061 | $56 |
116 | Donald Maxson | Brainard, NE 68626 | $56 |
117 | Luke Aaron Lutjelusche | Richland, NE 68601 | $55 |
118 | Rodney William Kroger | Lyons, NE 68038 | $54 |
119 | Kathy L Duda | Linwood, NE 68036 | $54 |
120 | Anthony J Buresh | David City, NE 68632 | $54 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”