Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in 1st District of Nebraska (Rep. Jeff Fortenberry), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 1,274

Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in 1st District of Nebraska (Rep. Jeff Fortenberry) totaled $36,401,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE)
1995-2023
161Jmv Farms IncDavid City, NE 68632$69,867
162West Center Farms IncDavid City, NE 68632$69,202
163Armbrust Family I LLCNebraska City, NE 68410$68,840
164Lynn PinneoRising City, NE 68658$68,650
165Novak Farms IncRosalie, NE 68055$68,592
166Kenneth L Ahrens IIWeeping Water, NE 68463$68,142
167Kent GrotelueschenOctavia, NE 68632$67,841
168Daniel W HomanDavid City, NE 68632$67,230
169Dale A LaunsbyOmaha, NE 68122$67,028
170Pine Tree Farm LtdSchuyler, NE 68661$66,940
171Michael Joseph EbelBellwood, NE 68624$66,448
172Teresa M OtteDavid City, NE 68632$66,110
173John Edward DoernemannDodge, NE 68633$65,584
174James Robert DoernemannDodge, NE 68633$65,584
175Jeffrey A TimmermanWest Point, NE 68788$65,426
176Michael GentrupBeemer, NE 68716$64,942
177Leroy A TimmermanWest Point, NE 68788$64,925
178Victor J BohuslavskyBrainard, NE 68626$64,178
179Sttl Farms LLCLyons, NE 68038$62,814
180Keith Merril NaberLincoln, NE 68516$61,987

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag