Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of Nebraska (Rep. Jeff Fortenberry), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 14,827

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of Nebraska (Rep. Jeff Fortenberry) totaled $1,404,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
161Dudley PerssonOakland, NE 68045$1,126,796
162Kratochvil BrothersUlysses, NE 68669$1,125,172
163Randall J BrommTekamah, NE 68061$1,121,395
164Dwight D BrahmerWisner, NE 68791$1,120,896
165Star Cam Farms IncLyons, NE 68038$1,118,457
166Gary E Olson Farms, IncDakota City, NE 68731$1,117,792
167Michael S DlouhyClarkson, NE 68629$1,113,815
168Jared Paul SindelarHowells, NE 68641$1,112,389
169Doht Farms IncPender, NE 68047$1,106,957
170Yindrick Farms LLCBruno, NE 68014$1,105,519
171Douglas Robert MorganWalthill, NE 68067$1,101,438
172Douglas E JohnsonThurston, NE 68062$1,095,102
173John James KobzaBellwood, NE 68624$1,091,802
174Ronald W NoltePlattsmouth, NE 68048$1,090,407
175Arnold Ernest VandenbergBrainard, NE 68626$1,087,748
176Benjamin Michael ScholtingLouisville, NE 68037$1,087,099
177Ruthann E BargmannBancroft, NE 68004$1,080,582
178Hauschild Farms IncAvoca, NE 68307$1,076,802
179Joel LamplotThurston, NE 68062$1,074,591
180Theodore Richard EriksenTekamah, NE 68061$1,071,132

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag