CCC Organic Programs in 1st District of Nebraska (Rep. Jeff Fortenberry), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 34
Recipients of CCC Organic Programs from farms in 1st District of Nebraska (Rep. Jeff Fortenberry) totaled $61,661 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | CCC Organic Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Herb K Hasenkamp | Beemer, NE 68716 | $4,500 |
2 | Stafford Bill Hasenkamp Jr | Beemer, NE 68716 | $4,500 |
3 | Cada Family Farms Limited Partnership | Clarkson, NE 68629 | $4,500 |
4 | Robert E Spenner | West Point, NE 68788 | $3,889 |
5 | Metzner Family Ptshp Ltd | Osceola, NE 68651 | $3,750 |
6 | Daniel D Humlicek | Columbus, NE 68602 | $3,264 |
7 | Michael A Soll | Bancroft, NE 68004 | $3,250 |
8 | Randall J Fendrich | Linwood, NE 68036 | $3,105 |
9 | James E Bender | Weeping Water, NE 68463 | $3,066 |
10 | Daerts Inc | David City, NE 68632 | $2,950 |
11 | Patrick A Roh | Abie, NE 68001 | $2,944 |
12 | Coughlin Family Farms LLC | Omaha, NE 68164 | $2,250 |
13 | Ashley Jo Kasik | David City, NE 68632 | $1,855 |
14 | Samuel G Barlean | David City, NE 68632 | $1,840 |
15 | Mike Lentsch | Murray, NE 68409 | $1,500 |
16 | Carey J Svanda | Nehawka, NE 68413 | $1,500 |
17 | Keith Felthousen | Murray, NE 68409 | $1,500 |
18 | Hill Crest Farms Inc | Schuyler, NE 68661 | $1,250 |
19 | , | $1,250 | |
20 | , | $1,250 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>