Counter Cyclical Program in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 35,630
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith) totaled $393,661,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Wohlgemuth Farms | Holdrege, NE 68949 | $210,252 |
22 | R & J Wahlgren Gp | Brady, NE 69123 | $209,141 |
23 | Weborg Farms Limited | Bridgeport, NE 69336 | $208,288 |
24 | Bartlett Partnership | Bartlett, NE 68622 | $205,700 |
25 | Murdoch Partnership | Orleans, NE 68966 | $202,888 |
26 | Chohon Farms | Oneill, NE 68763 | $202,100 |
27 | Scott & Karla Griess | Sutton, NE 68979 | $201,024 |
28 | B Smith & Son | Arnold, NE 69120 | $199,152 |
29 | Western Nebraska Farm Company A G | Venango, NE 69168 | $195,175 |
30 | D B A Ebberson Farms | Coleridge, NE 68727 | $192,352 |
31 | Craig & Terry Ebberson | Coleridge, NE 68727 | $184,548 |
32 | Wm J Finch Farms Gp | Paxton, NE 69155 | $183,648 |
33 | Hall Ag | Bridgeport, NE 69336 | $183,102 |
34 | Bergman Brothers | Holdrege, NE 68949 | $181,660 |
35 | Cruise Farms | Pleasanton, NE 68866 | $180,260 |
36 | Terryberry Farms Operating | Imperial, NE 69033 | $178,961 |
37 | Half Circle C Ranch | Hamer, ID 83425 | $178,611 |
38 | Triple G Farming Gen Part | Clarks, NE 68628 | $176,864 |
39 | B&b Ag | Fairmont, NE 68354 | $175,999 |
40 | S & S Farms | Arnold, NE 69120 | $174,694 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”