Conservation Reserve Program in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 25,894
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith) totaled $1,164,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gene G Purdy | Pine Bluffs, WY 82082 | $1,038,535 |
22 | Dorothy Kaufman | Hawk Springs, WY 82217 | $1,037,286 |
23 | Donald F Colson | Alliance, NE 69301 | $1,023,035 |
24 | Reginald Preston | Lyman, NE 69352 | $1,008,517 |
25 | Warren L Jessen | Bloomfield, NE 68718 | $986,715 |
26 | Smith Family Ranch LLC | Omaha, NE 68122 | $984,174 |
27 | James R Maly | Bennington, NE 68007 | $978,375 |
28 | Hi-line Farms | North Platte, NE 69101 | $977,126 |
29 | Billy Bob Laun-billy Bob Laun Trust | Table Rock, NE 68447 | $971,202 |
30 | Jessen Farms Inc | Sidney, NE 69162 | $971,193 |
31 | Mary Anne Wefso | Rushville, NE 69360 | $936,134 |
32 | Dean Johnson | Oxford, NE 68967 | $932,332 |
33 | Melvin S Thomas | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $927,961 |
34 | Edward J Knopik | Fullerton, NE 68638 | $922,478 |
35 | Huppert Partnership | Salem, NE 68433 | $915,999 |
36 | B A Dudden Inc | Holyoke, CO 80734 | $894,648 |
37 | Roy C Wittwer Jr | Sabetha, KS 66534 | $888,105 |
38 | Rick W Nelson Inc | Sidney, NE 69162 | $887,896 |
39 | Dale Buzzard | Burchard, NE 68323 | $878,870 |
40 | Michael Armstrong | Paxton, NE 69155 | $871,878 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”