Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 9,979
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith) totaled $56,402,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Haythorn Land And Cattle Co | Arthur, NE 69121 | $148,411 |
22 | Walking C Cattle Co | Lexington, NE 68850 | $144,229 |
23 | Colton Craig | Tryon, NE 69167 | $133,944 |
24 | Hatterman Land & Livestock LLC | Big Springs, NE 69122 | $131,336 |
25 | Tk Angus Co | Wood Lake, NE 69221 | $127,100 |
26 | Daron M Huyser | Elwood, NE 68937 | $123,697 |
27 | , | $117,064 | |
28 | Melvin J Suchy | Tryon, NE 69167 | $116,807 |
29 | Connealy Ranch - Gp | Whitman, NE 69366 | $115,157 |
30 | , | $109,277 | |
31 | , | $108,124 | |
32 | P R Partnership | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $107,766 |
33 | Lurz Cattle LLC | Crookston, NE 69212 | $107,063 |
34 | Janet Lingenfelter | Bassett, NE 68714 | $106,707 |
35 | Weber Enterprises Inc | Valentine, NE 69201 | $105,227 |
36 | Debra Lynn Kelly | Atkinson, NE 68713 | $103,843 |
37 | T & B Farms Inc | Sumner, NE 68878 | $102,679 |
38 | Chipper Witte | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $102,012 |
39 | Broken Bar Inc | Lexington, NE 68850 | $97,804 |
40 | , | $96,925 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”