Total Conservation Programs in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 29,475

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith) totaled $1,196,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
41Michael ArmstrongPaxton, NE 69155$874,400
42Molzer Farms LLCImperial, NE 69033$871,509
43Santee Sioux NationNiobrara, NE 68760$870,928
44Charles Victor MolvigOneill, NE 68763$861,519
45Leo Jessen Wyobraska IncScottsbluff, NE 69363$849,765
46William-william Pack Packer RevoAurora, NE 68818$842,584
47Ls FarmsOmaha, NE 68116$839,610
48Bradley L LokerParks, NE 69041$833,232
49Copley Farms PartnershipRiverton, NE 68972$825,716
50Nemechek BrosHumboldt, NE 68376$810,258
51Rhonda M PurdyPine Bluffs, WY 82082$810,151
52Allen E KelleyAmherst, NE 68812$810,134
53Rolland R & Shirley Madden Rev TrLantana, TX 76226$809,740
54Robert L MendenhallImperial, NE 69033$807,281
55Steve FriesMccook, NE 69001$805,340
56Maddux Family Ltd PtnspImperial, NE 69033$804,885
57Richard L Guilliams TrustFalls City, NE 68355$804,879
58Grant E FullerMadrid, NE 69150$803,025
59Donald E JespersenHemingford, NE 69348$791,082
60Glen L KlawonnPine Bluffs, WY 82082$788,402

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag