Total Conservation Programs in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 6,537
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith) totaled $53,967,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Waterbury Farms Inc | Blue Hill, NE 68930 | $50,000 |
42 | Molzer Farms LLC | Imperial, NE 69033 | $50,000 |
43 | Michael B Casey | Hemingford, NE 69348 | $50,000 |
44 | Judith Maline | Holbrook, NE 68948 | $50,000 |
45 | Robert L Georges | Falls City, NE 68355 | $50,000 |
46 | Charles R Ardissono | Oshkosh, NE 69154 | $50,000 |
47 | Lana M Georges | Falls City, NE 68355 | $50,000 |
48 | Robert D Milner | Champion, NE 69023 | $50,000 |
49 | E Yvonne Mooney | Ellsworth, NE 69340 | $50,000 |
50 | Service Company Of America | Rose, NE 68714 | $50,000 |
51 | Jippi Milner | Champion, NE 69023 | $50,000 |
52 | April Casey | Hemingford, NE 69348 | $50,000 |
53 | Smith Family Ranch LLC | Omaha, NE 68122 | $50,000 |
54 | Circle P Cattle Company | Lisco, NE 69148 | $50,000 |
55 | D K & G Soles Ltd | Ainsworth, NE 69210 | $50,000 |
56 | Ruth A Cline | Franklin, NE 68939 | $50,000 |
57 | Jean H Kearns | Gordon, NE 69343 | $50,000 |
58 | Colleen Bixby | Ellsworth, NE 69340 | $50,000 |
59 | Hathorn Cattle Co Inc | Gordon, NE 69343 | $50,000 |
60 | Hinn Ranch Inc | Lakeside, NE 69351 | $50,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”