Total Conservation Programs in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 6,252
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith) totaled $42,140,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Edward L Kester | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $48,819 |
62 | Werkmeister Farms LLC | Maywood, NE 69038 | $48,426 |
63 | C C Mulloy Ltd | Angora, NE 69331 | $48,352 |
64 | Fisher Co Land & Cattle Inc | Rushville, NE 69360 | $48,170 |
65 | Iowa Tribe Of Kansas And Nebraska | White Cloud, KS 66094 | $48,123 |
66 | John Engbrecht | Imperial, NE 69033 | $48,096 |
67 | Kara Engbrecht | Imperial, NE 69033 | $48,083 |
68 | Donna M Frank | Creighton, NE 68729 | $48,054 |
69 | Steve Fries | Mccook, NE 69001 | $48,048 |
70 | Dennis Hamilton | Franklin, NE 68939 | $47,923 |
71 | Jean Rhodes | Bridgeport, NE 69336 | $47,662 |
72 | Burke Brothers Inc | Alliance, NE 69301 | $47,355 |
73 | Larry Tietjen & Heritage Bank | Red Cloud, NE 68970 | $47,216 |
74 | Sipp Cattle Co | Rushville, NE 69360 | $47,094 |
75 | David Beck | Mills, NE 68753 | $46,917 |
76 | Dena L Vogel | Cumming, IA 50061 | $46,598 |
77 | Jerry L Ardissono | Oshkosh, NE 69154 | $46,433 |
78 | Michael Zerbe | Orchard, NE 68764 | $46,397 |
79 | David A Kaufman | Gering, NE 69341 | $46,188 |
80 | A M V LLC | Edison, NE 68936 | $46,061 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”