Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 27,492

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith) totaled $727,225,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
81Schiff PartnershipAlliance, NE 69301$340,914
82Alfs Farms PartnershipShickley, NE 68436$340,866
83Paul E & Julie K Folkerts Gen. Part.Carleton, NE 68326$340,774
84Paulsen Pork LLCColeridge, NE 68727$338,250
85Carlson Brothers LLCOverton, NE 68863$331,056
86Bruce Young Farms A Nebraska General PartnershipMadrid, NE 69150$330,342
87Lussetto Family LLCBroadwater, NE 69125$322,290
88Mcnutt Ranch LlpSutherland, NE 69165$322,190
89Gayle BeckerHartington, NE 68739$313,820
90H E Strand & SonsWauneta, NE 69045$312,247
91Tri R Farms IncSpringview, NE 68778$312,245
92Broken Bow Dairy LLCEden, WI 53019$306,582
93Kc FarmsSutton, NE 68979$306,354
94G & A FarmsMccook, NE 69001$301,443
95River Rock FarmsCozad, NE 69130$299,799
96Stromberger Farms IncImperial, NE 69033$296,615
97Panhandle Pig CoScottsbluff, NE 69361$295,987
98Heine Farms Feedyard LLCFordyce, NE 68736$294,910
99Tl Schilke Enterprises IncLamar, NE 69023$294,219
100Finch-williams FarmsOgallala, NE 69153$293,034

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag