Total Commodity Programs in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 9,476
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith) totaled $43,131,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | R & G Partnership | Eustis, NE 69028 | $37,544 |
122 | Robert Stahly | Stratton, NE 69043 | $37,524 |
123 | Robert E Nodlinski | Brule, NE 69127 | $37,520 |
124 | Klinkebiel Farms Inc | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $37,397 |
125 | Steven D Seeman | Stamford, NE 68977 | $37,295 |
126 | Lma Enterprises Llp | Ravenna, NE 68869 | $37,188 |
127 | O'neill Family Farms | Sumner, NE 68878 | $37,173 |
128 | Ronald Hagan | Madrid, NE 69150 | $37,113 |
129 | J Double T Farms LLC | Mc Cook, NE 69001 | $36,881 |
130 | Dennis Pokorny | Bartlett, NE 68622 | $36,682 |
131 | Brenda E Lutz | Parks, NE 69041 | $36,509 |
132 | Lavonne Hanchera | Danbury, NE 69026 | $36,464 |
133 | Buffalo Creek Farms Inc | Indianola, NE 69034 | $36,293 |
134 | Bussell Farms | Imperial, NE 69033 | $36,244 |
135 | Ryan D Cornelius | Grant, NE 69140 | $35,957 |
136 | Jd Farms Partnership | Clay Center, NE 68933 | $35,760 |
137 | Ginger Lutz | Benkelman, NE 69021 | $35,640 |
138 | Ork Farms Inc | Grant, NE 69140 | $35,510 |
139 | Jason And Renae Harmelink | Yankton, SD 57078 | $35,266 |
140 | Amy Robertson | Elsie, NE 69134 | $34,885 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”