Loan Deficiency in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 46,091
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith) totaled $1,295,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Linda S Zoerb Rev Tr | Litchfield, NE 68852 | $330,858 |
162 | D Michael Svoboda | Ogallala, NE 69153 | $330,218 |
163 | Cornhusker Swine Inc | Shickley, NE 68436 | $328,811 |
164 | Kelly J Rapp | Kearney, NE 68845 | $328,299 |
165 | Myers & Sons Livestock And Land Company | Cairo, NE 68824 | $328,232 |
166 | Martin Farms Ptnr | Pleasanton, NE 68866 | $326,429 |
167 | Scheinost Farms | Page, NE 68766 | $325,451 |
168 | F & K Farms Inc | Minden, NE 68959 | $325,414 |
169 | Holscher Land & Cattle Co | Ogallala, NE 69153 | $324,691 |
170 | Michael Paul Nelson | Holdrege, NE 68949 | $324,492 |
171 | Central Feeders Inc | Overton, NE 68863 | $324,366 |
172 | Holtzen Farms Inc | Davenport, NE 68335 | $323,552 |
173 | Olsen Cattle Company LLC | Minden, NE 68959 | $323,401 |
174 | Krab Inc | Paxton, NE 69155 | $322,263 |
175 | Rex A Peterson | Riverdale, NE 68870 | $322,184 |
176 | Glen T Petersen Farms Inc | Fairmont, NE 68354 | $321,666 |
177 | Crg Incorporated | Upland, NE 68981 | $321,356 |
178 | Animod Inc | Coleridge, NE 68727 | $321,047 |
179 | Mark Perlinger | Paxton, NE 69155 | $320,696 |
180 | Lisa Reinick | Haigler, NE 69030 | $320,613 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”