Total Disaster Programs in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 56,944

Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith) totaled $1,916,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Disaster Programs
1995-2023
1Oneill Cattle CompanyColumbus, NE 68602$1,614,676
2Rose E RammStuart, NE 68780$1,457,595
3Farm Services Agency **Langdon, ND 58249$1,261,332
4Britchin Cattle CoGordon, NE 69343$1,259,593
5Raichart Ranch PartnershipBenkelman, NE 69021$1,255,047
6Hanchera FarmsDanbury, NE 69026$1,203,288
7Parker FarmsBenkelman, NE 69021$1,133,313
8, $1,128,995
9Wine Glass Ranch IncImperial, NE 69033$1,094,189
10O'kief BrothersWood Lake, NE 69221$1,049,213
11Haythorn Land And Cattle CoArthur, NE 69121$1,040,551
12Blowers Farms LLCGothenburg, NE 69138$1,031,119
13Upstream Ranch LimitedTaylor, NE 68879$1,030,055
14Mjm Land And Cattle CoWauneta, NE 69045$1,025,981
15Weinreis BrothersScottsbluff, NE 69361$1,024,797
16Eagle Hills RanchGothenburg, NE 69138$1,018,167
17James L JelinekAlliance, NE 69301$1,013,436
18Edward D Mcdonald Sole ProprietorshipHay Springs, NE 69347$1,002,914
19Bruce KramerWauneta, NE 69045$993,342
20P R PartnershipGothenburg, NE 69138$978,364

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag