Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in 2nd District of New Hampshire (Rep. Ann Kuster), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 131
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in 2nd District of New Hampshire (Rep. Ann Kuster) totaled $305,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Haynes Homestead | Colebrook, NH 03576 | $1,891 |
42 | John R Schott | Jaffrey, NH 03452 | $1,890 |
43 | Camp Coniston-nh State Ymca | Grantham, NH 03753 | $1,875 |
44 | Ivan James | Golden, CO 80401 | $1,830 |
45 | Werner Naeck | Keene, NH 03431 | $1,811 |
46 | Suzanne Veilleux | Claremont, NH 03743 | $1,800 |
47 | Norman St. Aubin | Claremont, NH 03743 | $1,790 |
48 | John Scarinza | Berlin, NH 03570 | $1,750 |
49 | Dr David Cleasby | Laconia, NH 03246 | $1,746 |
50 | A R Sandri | Winchester, NH 03470 | $1,688 |
51 | Tobac Inc Dba Boggy Meadow Farm | Walpole, NH 03608 | $1,663 |
52 | Guy V Placey Jr | Colebrook, NH 03576 | $1,653 |
53 | Barbara Jarvis | Claremont, NH 03743 | $1,637 |
54 | Blueberry Acres | Alstead, NH 03602 | $1,605 |
55 | Robert Keazer | Colebrook, NH 03576 | $1,584 |
56 | Terry Mednick | Marlborough, NH 03455 | $1,580 |
57 | New England Forestry Fdtn | Groton, MA 01450 | $1,503 |
58 | Peter W. Spear | Concord, NH 03301 | $1,500 |
59 | Zenaide Bradley | Dalton, NH 03598 | $1,500 |
60 | Roberta Ryan | North Berwick, ME 03906 | $1,494 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”