Total Subsidies in 2nd District of New Hampshire (Rep. Ann Kuster), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 629

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of New Hampshire (Rep. Ann Kuster) totaled $26,208,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
1Putnam Farms IncCharlestown, NH 03603$1,892,164
2Forbes Family Partnership Dba Forbes Farm PartnersLancaster, NH 03584$1,614,635
3Forbes Farm PartnershipLancaster, NH 03584$1,286,060
4Chickering Farm IncWestmoreland, NH 03467$1,190,974
5Windyhurst Farm PartnershipWestmoreland, NH 03467$982,324
6Charles White & SonsColebrook, NH 03576$828,311
7Flint Farm - Rick & Karen FlintMilan, NH 03588$808,534
8Edward MacglaflinClaremont, NH 03743$672,419
9Macglaflin Farm LLCClaremont, NH 03743$649,317
10Leclair Acres Farm LLCClaremont, NH 03743$506,389
11Mac's Happy AcresPlainfield, NH 03781$500,602
12Leclair AcresClaremont, NH 03743$448,179
13Cadillac Farms, LLCAlstead, NH 03602$414,290
14Crescent FarmWalpole, NH 03608$367,040
15Kelly BrothersWinchester, NH 03470$365,670
16Alyson's Apple Orchard IncWalpole, NH 03608$341,858
17Gray Mist FarmGroveton, NH 03582$339,343
18Tobac Inc Dba Boggy Meadow FarmWalpole, NH 03608$310,433
19Eccardt Farm IncWashington, NH 03280$289,128
20Echo Farm IncHinsdale, NH 03451$282,068

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag