Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of New Hampshire (Rep. Ann Kuster), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 408
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of New Hampshire (Rep. Ann Kuster) totaled $20,218,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Putnam Farms Inc | Charlestown, NH 03603 | $1,738,351 |
2 | Forbes Family Partnership Dba Forbes Farm Partners | Lancaster, NH 03584 | $1,281,111 |
3 | Forbes Farm Partnership | Lancaster, NH 03584 | $1,033,721 |
4 | Chickering Farm Inc | Westmoreland, NH 03467 | $1,019,277 |
5 | Windyhurst Farm Partnership | Westmoreland, NH 03467 | $751,490 |
6 | Charles White & Sons | Colebrook, NH 03576 | $639,318 |
7 | Edward Macglaflin | Claremont, NH 03743 | $570,169 |
8 | Macglaflin Farm LLC | Claremont, NH 03743 | $515,285 |
9 | Mac's Happy Acres | Plainfield, NH 03781 | $479,092 |
10 | Leclair Acres | Claremont, NH 03743 | $441,591 |
11 | Flint Farm - Rick & Karen Flint | Milan, NH 03588 | $394,392 |
12 | Leclair Acres Farm LLC | Claremont, NH 03743 | $369,029 |
13 | Tobac Inc Dba Boggy Meadow Farm | Walpole, NH 03608 | $288,890 |
14 | Cadillac Farms, LLC | Alstead, NH 03602 | $280,967 |
15 | Eccardt Farm Inc | Washington, NH 03280 | $279,445 |
16 | T R Dillon Logging Inc | Anson, ME 04911 | $270,698 |
17 | Vincent Malnati | Walpole, NH 03608 | $265,578 |
18 | Stoneholm Farm LLC | Putney, VT 05346 | $227,850 |
19 | Kelly Brothers | Winchester, NH 03470 | $225,264 |
20 | A B Logging Inc | Lancaster, NH 03584 | $214,540 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>