Counter Cyclical Program in 2nd District of New Jersey (Rep. Jefferson Van Drew), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 192
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 2nd District of New Jersey (Rep. Jefferson Van Drew) totaled $952,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Don L Hinchman | Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038 | $7,026 |
42 | Donald B Stimpson | Monroeville, NJ 08343 | $6,973 |
43 | Wellacrest Farms Inc | Mullica Hill, NJ 08062 | $6,947 |
44 | John F Hubschmidt | Bridgeton, NJ 08302 | $6,814 |
45 | Sickler Bros LLC | Woodstown, NJ 08098 | $6,672 |
46 | William N Brooks Jr | Elmer, NJ 08318 | $6,457 |
47 | Coles Brothers Farm | Elmer, NJ 08318 | $6,176 |
48 | Bonham Brothers | Bridgeton, NJ 08302 | $6,096 |
49 | Richard D Fogg | Salem, NJ 08079 | $5,992 |
50 | Wilson Brothers Farms | Elmer, NJ 08318 | $5,930 |
51 | Coleman Brothers Farms LLC | Elmer, NJ 08318 | $5,821 |
52 | John H Weber Jr | Salem, NJ 08079 | $5,804 |
53 | Carroll Ansink | Bridgeton, NJ 08302 | $5,613 |
54 | Edward O English Dba English Farm | Elmer, NJ 08318 | $5,368 |
55 | Lee C Williams | Elmer, NJ 08318 | $5,265 |
56 | Van Meter Farms Inc | Bridgeton, NJ 08302 | $5,204 |
57 | Joseph Doak | Woodstown, NJ 08098 | $5,148 |
58 | Robert Mayhew LLC | Bridgeton, NJ 08302 | $5,105 |
59 | Donald Scheese | Elmer, NJ 08318 | $5,067 |
60 | John Richman | Salem, NJ 08079 | $4,751 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”