Total Conservation Programs in 2nd District of New Jersey (Rep. Jefferson Van Drew), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 84
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 2nd District of New Jersey (Rep. Jefferson Van Drew) totaled $239,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | John Richman | Salem, NJ 08079 | $334 |
62 | Kelly Farms LLC | Pilesgrove, NJ 08098 | $331 |
63 | Rottkamp Farms Inc | Bridgeton, NJ 08302 | $319 |
64 | Bonham Farms LLC | Bridgeton, NJ 08302 | $310 |
65 | Earl Quirk | Pilesgrove, NJ 08098 | $298 |
66 | Homestake Nursery LLC | Darien, CT 06820 | $269 |
67 | James T Eller | Monroeville, NJ 08343 | $248 |
68 | Dubois' Spring Brook Farms LLC | Pittsgrove, NJ 08318 | $242 |
69 | Coleman Brothers Farms LLC | Elmer, NJ 08318 | $226 |
70 | Genoa Farms Inc | Vineland, NJ 08360 | $217 |
71 | Suzanne H Culver | Salem, NJ 08079 | $204 |
72 | Jim Coombs LLC | Elmer, NJ 08318 | $189 |
73 | Mark S Coles | Voorhees, NJ 08043 | $182 |
74 | Robert Todd Gaum | Cream Ridge, NJ 08514 | $158 |
75 | Edward B Olbrich | Pittsgrove, NJ 08318 | $152 |
76 | John B Bitter III | Salem, NJ 08079 | $146 |
77 | Michael Catalano T/a M & J Catalano Farms | Salem, NJ 08079 | $120 |
78 | M R Dickinson And Son Inc | Bridgeton, NJ 08302 | $109 |
79 | Wayne Harris | Newport, NJ 08345 | $98 |
80 | John C Moore | Monroeville, NJ 08343 | $95 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”