Livestock Forage Disaster Program in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,678

Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small) totaled $182,731,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Livestock Forage Disaster Program
1995-2023
21Smyer Family CorporationDeming, NM 88031$748,162
22Mcneill RanchHobbs, NM 88241$737,026
23Williams Family Ranch LLCLas Cruces, NM 88004$729,472
24Prime Plus Beef LLCReagan, TX 76680$728,551
25Corrales Livestock CorpCarlsbad, NM 88221$719,652
26H C HendricksFlying H, NM 88339$716,443
27Kincaid BrothersPinon, NM 88344$714,877
28Four Mile Livestock LLCMayhill, NM 88339$702,772
29Gents Cattle Co IncRoswell, NM 88203$696,102
30Jr Engineering & Construction IncCarlsbad, NM 88221$694,368
31Bar W Ranch IncCarrizozo, NM 88301$687,533
32Steele Ranch IncorporatedFort Sumner, NM 88119$656,475
33Russell LeonardHope, NM 88250$648,258
34Justin NunnDeming, NM 88030$648,064
35David G CornRoswell, NM 88201$632,553
36Slash 46 IncLoving, NM 88256$628,356
37J & W Cattle CoFort Sumner, NM 88119$623,175
38Hyatt & Hyatt LLCDeming, NM 88030$622,346
39Escondida Land & Cattle CoDeming, NM 88031$620,910
40Casabonne Family Limited PartnersHope, NM 88250$620,842

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag