Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 957

Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small) totaled $22,485,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP)
1995-2023
21Joe Brad MorrisLake Arthur, NM 88253$124,496
22One Hundred - Poverty Flats Land & Cattle CompanyCarrizozo, NM 88301$119,899
23Tray FieldPlains, TX 79355$115,323
24Double Springs Ranch LLCMonticello, NM 87939$115,065
25L T Cattle Co LLCSilver City, NM 88062$114,925
26, $113,890
27Leigh MurphyYeso, NM 88136$113,477
28Badger Creek CorporationSpringerville, AZ 85938$112,317
29Mathis Land And Cattle IncElida, NM 88116$111,813
302c Ranch General PartnershipTyrone, NM 88065$107,696
31H C HendricksFlying H, NM 88339$106,754
32Pearce TrustPecos, TX 79772$105,022
33Gallacher Land & Cattle CoCarrizozo, NM 88301$104,022
34Eby Cattle LLCFaywood, NM 88034$103,993
35Ace PetersonSan Simon, AZ 85632$103,162
36Bill MarleyRoswell, NM 88203$98,376
37Clifford Kohl StuddardRoswell, NM 88202$97,161
38Roy Pearce Sr TrustPecos, TX 79772$96,810
39Smyer Family CorporationDeming, NM 88031$95,604
40Jodie L BookoutDeming, NM 88031$94,958

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag