Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,133

Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small) totaled $46,027,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs
1995-2023
81Walter J Coil Randy L & Jean A CoMonticello, NM 87939$104,098
82Jack M Cain Limited PartnershipTruth Or Consequence, NM 87901$103,673
83Lynn MedlinTatum, NM 88267$103,602
84Bruton Ranch LLCMagdalena, NM 87825$103,566
85Good Cattle CoElida, NM 88116$101,354
86Casabonne Family Limited PartnersHope, NM 88250$101,214
87Michael W HartonTatum, NM 88267$100,829
884-d Cattle Company IncFort Sumner, NM 88119$100,380
89Paul GableSudan, TX 79371$99,880
90Bryan PratherPinon, NM 88344$99,844
91L & L Cattle PartnershipMelrose, NM 88124$99,455
92Peterson Ranch Ltd PartnershipFort Sumner, NM 88119$99,364
93Adonis Forest Prod IncFort Sumner, NM 88119$99,198
94Robert WeedWinston, NM 87943$98,967
95Winston BallardCarlsbad, NM 88220$98,488
96Beckham Ranch IncJal, NM 88252$97,385
97Oliver Lee JrMountainair, NM 87036$96,242
98Rafter J L Ranch Ltd PartnershipMesa, AZ 85204$95,621
99Norris Cattle Co LLCLovington, NM 88260$95,072
1004 T & K Cross Cattle CoWelch, TX 79377$94,678

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag