Total Disaster Programs in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 4,147

Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small) totaled $424,166,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Disaster Programs
1995-2023
121Buckhorn RanchTruth Or Consequence, NM 87901$715,366
122Holcomb Family Ranch LLCAlamogordo, NM 88310$704,646
123Goss & Goss Dba Scramento Grazing AssociationWeed, NM 88354$704,127
124Eby RanchFaywood, NM 88034$703,494
125Windy Ridge Cattle Co IncFort Sumner, NM 88119$701,917
126Clifford Kohl StuddardRoswell, NM 88202$701,887
127Dale MuncyBingham, NM 87832$701,319
128Timm HaasMule Creek, NM 88051$700,797
129Lee Cattle Co LtdLovington, NM 88260$698,594
130Gallacher Land & Cattle CoCarrizozo, NM 88301$696,184
13177 Investments LLCDatil, NM 87821$689,491
132Jerry McphaulPie Town, NM 87827$677,412
133Gary & Karen Jackson FarmsHobbs, NM 88241$676,926
134Double Springs Ranch LLCMonticello, NM 87939$673,286
135Mill Iron IncRoswell, NM 88201$666,430
136Edgar Ranches Ltd. Limited PartnershipCapitan, NM 88316$666,052
137Corralitos Ranch LLCFairacres, NM 88033$665,509
138Eby Cattle LLCFaywood, NM 88034$658,855
139Tray FieldPlains, TX 79355$658,368
140Joe David Yates IncMason, TX 76856$655,458

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag