Total Disaster Programs in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 4,147

Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small) totaled $424,166,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Disaster Programs
1995-2023
161Bar Double L Ranch IncMelrose, NM 88124$589,851
162Roy Pearce Sr TrustPecos, TX 79772$588,863
163Good Cattle CoElida, NM 88116$584,332
164Cash T MasseyAnimas, NM 88020$583,017
165The Murray Keeler & Judith Keeler Revocable TrustAnimas, NM 88020$575,516
166Terrell ShelleyCliff, NM 88028$572,445
1674mcc Cattle Co LLCFort Sumner, NM 88119$570,981
168Dasco Cattle Co LLCHobbs, NM 88241$570,476
169Rod HilleTruth Or Consequence, NM 87901$570,153
170Winston BallardCarlsbad, NM 88220$565,910
171Laredo Farms IncEl Paso, TX 79912$559,695
172Bonita Canyon Ranch LpSanta Fe, NM 87504$557,873
173Ogden Farms And Cattle CoLoving, NM 88256$557,602
174Noisy Water Winery, Inc.Ruidoso, NM 88345$554,077
175Marvin & Dorothy Ake Revocable TrustMagdalena, NM 87825$549,888
176Ferguson Family TrustCarrizozo, NM 88301$549,057
177Justin KippLordsburg, NM 88045$546,183
178Daniel C Berry IIIEunice, NM 88231$545,407
179Gallacher Ranches IncCarrizozo, NM 88301$542,599
180Jim W PattersonBingham, NM 87832$541,890

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag