Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 76
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small) totaled $827,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Larry B Hughes | Monument, NM 88265 | $12,832 |
22 | Lawrence Enterprises Limited Partnership Llp | Hobbs, NM 88242 | $12,684 |
23 | Overta Lea Smylie Rvoc Tr | Beaver, OK 73932 | $11,536 |
24 | Choya D Young | Plains, TX 79355 | $11,475 |
25 | Kristi L Howe | Crossroads, NM 88114 | $9,935 |
26 | A D Jones Estate Inc | Roswell, NM 88202 | $9,140 |
27 | William C Noland | Aztec, NM 87410 | $8,908 |
28 | Betty Hemann | Mcdonald, NM 88262 | $8,545 |
29 | Treva Brensing Farms, LLC | Wichita, KS 67206 | $8,151 |
30 | Ben Powell | Mcdonald, NM 88262 | $7,388 |
31 | William H Ratliff And Doris V Ratliff Rev Tr | Lubbock, TX 79423 | $6,922 |
32 | Sondra K Allen | Tatum, NM 88267 | $6,900 |
33 | Richard Vaughan | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $6,717 |
34 | Randall Gandy | Lovington, NM 88260 | $6,527 |
35 | Glenn Thompson | Tatum, NM 88267 | $6,450 |
36 | Royce Fort | Lovington, NM 88260 | $6,268 |
37 | Willie Loewen | Seminole, TX 79360 | $6,102 |
38 | Bess Homestead Ranch LLC | Tatum, NM 88267 | $5,900 |
39 | First United Bank ** | Seagraves, TX 79359 | $5,897 |
40 | Jimmy Hodge | Lovington, NM 88260 | $5,530 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”