Total Disaster Programs in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 4,147

Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small) totaled $424,166,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Disaster Programs
1995-2023
21Johnson Ranches LLCColumbus, NM 88029$1,610,371
22Steele Ranch IncorporatedFort Sumner, NM 88119$1,583,708
23At Cross Cattle CoTyrone, NM 88065$1,580,183
24Russell LeonardHope, NM 88250$1,543,115
253 Slash Land & Cattle LLCTaiban, NM 88134$1,486,940
26David G CornRoswell, NM 88201$1,455,894
27Jr Engineering & Construction IncCarlsbad, NM 88221$1,452,033
28Kinsolving & KinsolvingTatum, NM 88267$1,410,940
29Bar W Ranch IncCarrizozo, NM 88301$1,396,164
30One Hundred - Poverty Flats Land & Cattle CompanyCarrizozo, NM 88301$1,381,628
31Gents Cattle Co IncRoswell, NM 88203$1,363,723
32Hyatt & Hyatt LLCDeming, NM 88030$1,331,628
33Corrales Livestock CorpCarlsbad, NM 88221$1,329,862
34Casabonne Family Limited PartnersHope, NM 88250$1,327,629
35Smyer Family CorporationDeming, NM 88031$1,252,018
36Badger Creek CorporationSpringerville, AZ 85938$1,235,309
37J & W Cattle CoFort Sumner, NM 88119$1,180,021
38Harriet Ranch LLCDatil, NM 87821$1,179,648
39Troy FloydRoswell, NM 88202$1,173,593
407d Holding CompanyLubbock, TX 79424$1,170,157

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag