Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small), 2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 887

Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small) totaled $7,735,000 in in 2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP)
2023
1Mescalero Apache TribeMescalero, NM 88340$171,505
2Mcneill RanchHobbs, NM 88241$86,787
3Marley & WhitneyRoswell, NM 88202$72,639
4Joe Brad MorrisLake Arthur, NM 88253$67,746
5Michael Edward MirandaMule Creek, NM 88051$67,185
6Ladyhawk Agua Negra LLCSanta Rosa, NM 88435$59,816
7Badger Creek CorporationSpringerville, AZ 85938$59,619
8U Bar RanchGila, NM 88038$53,033
9Taylor RanchRoswell, NM 88202$51,296
10Kathryn MarleyRoswell, NM 88201$49,572
11Cornerstone Ranch IncFort Sumner, NM 88119$48,588
12Tom Mc Cauley & Son IncCliff, NM 88028$48,196
13Williams Family Ranch LLCLas Cruces, NM 88004$48,075
14Leigh MurphyYeso, NM 88136$44,954
15Harrington Ranch PartnersMimbres, NM 88049$44,492
16One Hundred - Poverty Flats Land & Cattle CompanyCarrizozo, NM 88301$43,183
17Tray FieldPlains, TX 79355$42,951
182c Ranch General PartnershipTyrone, NM 88065$42,091
19Gents Cattle Co IncRoswell, NM 88203$41,556
20Tailgate Cattle Co LLCLa Mesa, NM 88044$41,295

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag