Loan Deficiency in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 900
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small) totaled $22,411,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | William Massey & Son Inc | Animas, NM 88020 | $180,276 |
22 | Dale Ray Burnett | Lovington, NM 88260 | $175,193 |
23 | M & G Joint Venture | Hobbs, NM 88241 | $173,262 |
24 | Kevin Penn | Deming, NM 88030 | $172,738 |
25 | Lowe Minerals And Land Family Partnership, Ltd | Lubbock, TX 79401 | $170,603 |
26 | Bogle Ltd Co | Dexter, NM 88230 | $169,345 |
27 | Sterrett Farms Inc | Dexter, NM 88230 | $160,219 |
28 | Marley Farms Ltd | Roswell, NM 88203 | $156,447 |
29 | Tom Simmons | Deming, NM 88030 | $155,279 |
30 | Walterscheid Trucking & Farms Inc | Carlsbad, NM 88220 | $149,351 |
31 | Kenneth Ivan Goff | Hobbs, NM 88242 | $147,450 |
32 | Jennings Farms | Roswell, NM 88203 | $144,656 |
33 | Oasis Dairy Farms Inc | Roswell, NM 88203 | $141,005 |
34 | Rancho La Frontera | Columbus, NM 88029 | $139,069 |
35 | Wier Brothers | Lovington, NM 88260 | $138,666 |
36 | Tharp Farms | Las Cruces, NM 88007 | $126,837 |
37 | James A Yates | Shallowater, TX 79363 | $126,270 |
38 | James E Yates | Deming, NM 88031 | $126,269 |
39 | W-f Farms LLC | Dexter, NM 88230 | $125,692 |
40 | Tim Wier Inc | Lovington, NM 88260 | $125,533 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”