Market Gains in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 205
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small) totaled $2,921,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Eva R Froese | Seminole, TX 79360 | $40,756 |
| 22 | Mayberry Inc | Artesia, NM 88210 | $37,727 |
| 23 | John P Stroud | Denver City, TX 79323 | $37,307 |
| 24 | Jjm Farms LLC | Dexter, NM 88230 | $34,315 |
| 25 | Rogers Inc | Artesia, NM 88210 | $32,034 |
| 26 | Larry Parker | Hobbs, NM 88242 | $31,810 |
| 27 | Jones Farms LLC | Virden, NM 88045 | $30,778 |
| 28 | W R Johnson & Sons LLC | Columbus, NM 88029 | $28,935 |
| 29 | Ross Wier | Lovington, NM 88260 | $28,657 |
| 30 | Ben & Sara Neudorf Farm | Poteau, OK 74953 | $27,378 |
| 31 | Rmb Ventures LLC | Las Cruces, NM 88007 | $26,879 |
| 32 | Majestic Farms Inc | Hatch, NM 87937 | $26,411 |
| 33 | Rodney And Mary Lou Tharp | Las Cruces, NM 88007 | $26,245 |
| 34 | Johnson Farms LLC | Lake Arthur, NM 88253 | $23,308 |
| 35 | Joe L Whitman Pumping Inc | Lovington, NM 88260 | $22,745 |
| 36 | Waterloo Farm Partnership | Deming, NM 88030 | $21,646 |
| 37 | Lack Farms Inc | Hatch, NM 87937 | $19,991 |
| 38 | Pauline Hilburn Tr | Denver City, TX 79323 | $19,879 |
| 39 | Lawrence Enterprises Limited Partnership Llp | Hobbs, NM 88242 | $19,820 |
| 40 | Rjf Farms Inc | Hatch, NM 87937 | $19,695 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf