Production Flexibility Program in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,867
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small) totaled $34,817,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rancho La Frontera | Columbus, NM 88029 | $669,846 |
| 2 | Veck Farms | Fort Collins, CO 80525 | $487,459 |
| 3 | Ross Hilburn Farms | Denver City, TX 79323 | $441,758 |
| 4 | W R Johnson & Sons LLC | Columbus, NM 88029 | $297,713 |
| 5 | Massey Farms Inc Dba Massey Enterprises | Animas, NM 88020 | $297,620 |
| 6 | Horner Farms Inc | Artesia, NM 88211 | $297,124 |
| 7 | Bogle Ltd Co | Dexter, NM 88230 | $294,032 |
| 8 | Berry Land & Cattle LLC | Dexter, NM 88230 | $240,115 |
| 9 | Rogers Inc | Artesia, NM 88210 | $224,553 |
| 10 | Clearwater Corporation | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $222,194 |
| 11 | Brantley Farms | Carlsbad, NM 88220 | $209,428 |
| 12 | Jennings Farms | Roswell, NM 88203 | $207,096 |
| 13 | David Ramos | Lordsburg, NM 88045 | $207,013 |
| 14 | Jimmy Pack Farms | Roswell, NM 88202 | $205,909 |
| 15 | P I Farms | Animas, NM 88020 | $205,552 |
| 16 | William Massey & Son Inc | Animas, NM 88020 | $204,114 |
| 17 | M & G Joint Venture | Hobbs, NM 88241 | $202,743 |
| 18 | Jones & Swapp Land & Cattle Inc | Duncan, AZ 85534 | $186,089 |
| 19 | James Eubank | Hobbs, NM 88240 | $185,930 |
| 20 | Diamond Heart Farms Inc | Roswell, NM 88202 | $185,912 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf