Livestock Forage Disaster Program in 3rd District of New Mexico (Rep. Ben Lujan), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,145
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in 3rd District of New Mexico (Rep. Ben Lujan) totaled $13,318,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Libby Cattle Company | Bueyeros, NM 88415 | $96,266 |
22 | Jimmy A Garcia | Roy, NM 87743 | $94,036 |
23 | V Seven Ranch Co | Raton, NM 87740 | $93,594 |
24 | Smith Land & Ranch Co, LLC | Mills, NM 87730 | $91,367 |
25 | Sierra Grande Cattle Co | Des Moines, NM 88418 | $89,605 |
26 | , | $88,626 | |
27 | Rush Farms Inc | Mcalister, NM 88427 | $88,222 |
28 | Rush Ranch Inc | Mcalister, NM 88427 | $86,734 |
29 | Crossing Y Ranch | Bueyeros, NM 88415 | $85,144 |
30 | Jim K Miller Ranches LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85050 | $80,740 |
31 | Tony Martinez II | Grenville, NM 88424 | $79,904 |
32 | D & J Farms | Mcalister, NM 88427 | $78,285 |
33 | B Arlene Daniels | Wagon Mound, NM 87752 | $77,857 |
34 | Glen Franklin Cattle Company | House, NM 88121 | $77,524 |
35 | David Walker | Springer, NM 87747 | $75,926 |
36 | Chappy's O-y Land & Cattle Inc | Nara Visa, NM 88430 | $75,719 |
37 | Gregory A Moore | Springer, NM 87747 | $71,097 |
38 | Rafter J Cattle Company | Nara Visa, NM 88430 | $70,130 |
39 | Robin H Smith | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $70,051 |
40 | James R Burns | Nara Visa, NM 88430 | $69,924 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”