Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 3rd District of New Mexico (Rep. Ben Lujan), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 588
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 3rd District of New Mexico (Rep. Ben Lujan) totaled $6,379,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Patrick J Melton | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $43,372 |
22 | W J Sandoval | Dulce, NM 87528 | $43,324 |
23 | Mary Clugston 24358 | Waterflow, NM 87421 | $41,091 |
24 | Armand L Smith | Clovis, NM 88102 | $40,510 |
25 | John M Steigelman | Farmington, NM 87401 | $39,980 |
26 | Harper Cattle LLC | Arlington, TX 76015 | $39,315 |
27 | Lupe Young | Questa, NM 87556 | $37,950 |
28 | Barry Poling | Texline, TX 79087 | $37,546 |
29 | F & F Cattle Company | Mosquero, NM 87733 | $37,419 |
30 | Tony Casados Sr. And Sons | Tierra Amarilla, NM 87575 | $36,536 |
31 | Robert W Highfill | Chama, NM 87520 | $36,134 |
32 | Rush Ranch Inc | Mcalister, NM 88427 | $35,937 |
33 | Higino Martinez | Clayton, NM 88415 | $35,608 |
34 | Maxine Wallace | Grady, NM 88120 | $34,999 |
35 | Albert A Archuleta | Ocate, NM 87734 | $34,281 |
36 | Atchley Ranch Inc | Odessa, TX 79762 | $33,853 |
37 | Donna Ray | Roy, NM 87743 | $33,325 |
38 | Lindbergh Velarde | Lindrith, NM 87029 | $32,063 |
39 | Earl Sury | Albuquerque, NM 87111 | $30,600 |
40 | Youngs Land & Cattle | Questa, NM 87556 | $28,644 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”