Farm Subsidy information
3rd District of New Mexico
(Rep. Ben Lujan)
Total Subsidies in 3rd District of New Mexico (Rep. Ben Lujan), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,786
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 3rd District of New Mexico (Rep. Ben Lujan) totaled $33,610,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Rush Ranch Inc | Mcalister, NM 88427 | $149,774 |
42 | Armand And Craig Smith Partnershi | Clovis, NM 88102 | $146,237 |
43 | Circle M 8 Land & Cattle | Salado, TX 76571 | $144,269 |
44 | Teel Durrett | Amarillo, TX 79102 | $138,955 |
45 | Triple R LLC | Melrose, NM 88124 | $138,505 |
46 | Sauble Ranch Co | Maxwell, NM 87728 | $137,900 |
47 | O'neal Family Ranch LLC | Panhandle, TX 79068 | $136,570 |
48 | Barbara Smith | Mills, NM 87730 | $133,581 |
49 | Tonya C Cone | Logan, NM 88426 | $124,238 |
50 | Kennon Decker | Aztec, NM 87410 | $122,265 |
51 | Mikael Nixon | Nara Visa, NM 88430 | $121,301 |
52 | Mary Margaret Sours | Mcalister, NM 88427 | $118,810 |
53 | Yvonne Trujillo | Cimarron, NM 87714 | $116,499 |
54 | Wanette Davis | Grenville, NM 88424 | $112,367 |
55 | Billy R Crisp | Clayton, NM 88415 | $111,290 |
56 | Rex & Kathy Rush | Clovis, NM 88101 | $109,732 |
57 | Double M Cattle LLC | Lovington, NM 88260 | $109,300 |
58 | Martin J Mathis | Amistad, NM 88410 | $108,681 |
59 | Michael Lee Cone | Portales, NM 88130 | $106,970 |
60 | Trigg Cattle Company | Mosquero, NM 87733 | $106,887 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”