Livestock Forage Disaster Program in 3rd District of New Mexico (Rep. Ben Lujan), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,641
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in 3rd District of New Mexico (Rep. Ben Lujan) totaled $106,392,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Grant Smith | Springfield, CO 81073 | $332,030 |
62 | Sumpter - Bannon L & C Co Inc | Folsom, NM 88419 | $330,609 |
63 | Bernilda Marrujo | Mora, NM 87732 | $326,116 |
64 | Rush Farms Inc | Mcalister, NM 88427 | $317,922 |
65 | Glen Franklin Cattle Company | House, NM 88121 | $310,794 |
66 | Edward G Walker | Clayton, NM 88415 | $300,711 |
67 | Kennon Decker | Aztec, NM 87410 | $298,827 |
68 | San Jon Ranch LLC | San Jon, NM 88434 | $297,258 |
69 | Sanchez Ranch Inc | Solano, NM 87746 | $296,622 |
70 | Robin H Smith | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $296,194 |
71 | Tramperos Cattle Company | Panhandle, TX 79068 | $288,675 |
72 | Ross Carter | Clayton, NM 88415 | $284,837 |
73 | Hilma Swagerty | Clayton, NM 88415 | $277,043 |
74 | Alice M Moore | Raton, NM 87740 | $276,839 |
75 | Bradshaw 2018 Exempt Trust | Flower Mound, TX 75027 | $276,817 |
76 | Lyons Ranch | Cuervo, NM 88417 | $273,910 |
77 | Michael Perez | Nara Visa, NM 88430 | $262,937 |
78 | Mary Lou Kern | Maxwell, NM 87728 | $262,891 |
79 | Chappy's O-y Land & Cattle Inc | Mosquero, NM 87733 | $261,694 |
80 | Todd R Kimble | Clayton, NM 88415 | $257,883 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”