Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in 3rd District of New Mexico (Rep. Ben Lujan), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 377
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in 3rd District of New Mexico (Rep. Ben Lujan) totaled $991,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Gj Lands LLC | Albuquerque, NM 87111 | $1,850 |
122 | San Jon Ranch LLC | San Jon, NM 88434 | $1,834 |
123 | Charlie H Allen | Grady, NM 88120 | $1,827 |
124 | Gene Cox Jr | Logan, NM 88426 | $1,756 |
125 | Agrow Credit Corporation ** | Austin, TX 78745 | $1,615 |
126 | Fluhman Brothers | Amarillo, TX 79118 | $1,583 |
127 | Youngs Land & Cattle | Questa, NM 87556 | $1,572 |
128 | Dennis E Farrow | Moriarty, NM 87035 | $1,571 |
129 | Orlando A Romero | Sapello, NM 87745 | $1,565 |
130 | Briceson J Nightingale | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $1,550 |
131 | Orlando V Romero | Sapello, NM 87745 | $1,520 |
132 | Vh Land And Cattle LLC | Clayton, NM 88415 | $1,514 |
133 | Alton D Unruh & Virginia F Unruh Trust | Greensburg, KS 67054 | $1,507 |
134 | Wayne Carter | Grady, NM 88120 | $1,486 |
135 | Phillip M Box | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $1,484 |
136 | Philip Ray Akin | Mcalister, NM 88427 | $1,465 |
137 | Effie Walker | Clayton, NM 88415 | $1,448 |
138 | Clint Runyan | Melrose, NM 88124 | $1,448 |
139 | R Del Choate | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $1,437 |
140 | Romni Durrett | Amarillo, TX 79102 | $1,424 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”