Farm Subsidy information
3rd District of New Mexico
(Rep. Ben Lujan)
Total Subsidies in 3rd District of New Mexico (Rep. Ben Lujan), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,354
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 3rd District of New Mexico (Rep. Ben Lujan) totaled $14,083,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | First National Bank Of New Mexico ** | Clayton, NM 88415 | $90,440 |
22 | Hoyt Rush | Grady, NM 88120 | $88,873 |
23 | Robert L Meeks 1998 Trust | Flower Mound, TX 75027 | $85,861 |
24 | Eric Rush | Melrose, NM 88124 | $84,478 |
25 | Todd And Honey Poling Jv | Clayton, NM 88415 | $83,647 |
26 | Cedar C Rush | Melrose, NM 88124 | $83,063 |
27 | Ww Farms & Ranch | San Jon, NM 88434 | $78,557 |
28 | Sterling Ranches | Coalgate, OK 74538 | $77,649 |
29 | Atchley Incorporated | Des Moines, NM 88418 | $75,624 |
30 | Rex & Kathy Rush | Clovis, NM 88101 | $71,069 |
31 | Clay S Mimms | Mcalister, NM 88427 | $70,662 |
32 | Cox River Ranch LLC | Logan, NM 88426 | $68,343 |
33 | Rush Land & Cattle Co Inc | Mcalister, NM 88427 | $68,131 |
34 | Robert R Lee | Mcalister, NM 88427 | $65,569 |
35 | Barry L Poling Corporation | Texline, TX 79087 | $64,503 |
36 | Charles Hibner | Cebolla, NM 87518 | $61,832 |
37 | Timothy L Morrow | Capulin, NM 88414 | $61,618 |
38 | Mark R Whetten | Newkirk, NM 88431 | $60,246 |
39 | Dennis & Deana Shugart | Amarillo, TX 79124 | $60,134 |
40 | Tonya C Cone | Logan, NM 88426 | $58,087 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”