Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Nevada
(Rep. Mark Amodei)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Nevada (Rep. Mark Amodei), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 430
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Nevada (Rep. Mark Amodei) totaled $28,408,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Wendell Neff Company | Ruby Valley, NV 89833 | $149,364 |
62 | Jess Sustacha Ranches Lp | Lamoille, NV 89828 | $148,985 |
63 | Bartell Ranch LLC | Orovada, NV 89425 | $143,763 |
64 | Barnes Ranches Inc | Spring Creek, NV 89815 | $143,081 |
65 | Duval Ranching Co | Ruby Valley, NV 89833 | $139,592 |
66 | Evan James Thompson Dba Thompson Lvsk | Winnemucca, NV 89445 | $138,069 |
67 | Paiute Meadows Grazing Association LLC | Winnemucca, NV 89446 | $137,629 |
68 | Neff Livestock & Equipment | Ruby Valley, NV 89833 | $135,939 |
69 | Kevin Tomera | Spring Creek, NV 89815 | $133,879 |
70 | J Bar M Ranching Co | Ruby Valley, NV 89833 | $131,511 |
71 | Erik Taylor | Battle Mountain, NV 89820 | $127,045 |
72 | Rock Creek Cattle Company LLC | Golconda, NV 89414 | $126,773 |
73 | Wh Gibbs Company | Wells, NV 89835 | $124,119 |
74 | Snow Livestock LLC | Fallon, NV 89407 | $121,487 |
75 | Steven F Maher | Mc Dermitt, NV 89421 | $120,591 |
76 | Mike Marvel Ranching | Battle Mountain, NV 89820 | $120,504 |
77 | Dan Filippini | Battle Mountain, NV 89820 | $119,878 |
78 | Alder Creek Denio Ranch LLC | Denio, NV 89404 | $119,392 |
79 | Vesco Ranch LLC | Winnemucca, NV 89446 | $118,157 |
80 | Golconda Butte Farms Inc | Winnemucca, NV 89445 | $117,917 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”