Loan Deficiency in 2nd District of Nevada (Rep. Mark Amodei), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 169
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in 2nd District of Nevada (Rep. Mark Amodei) totaled $1,490,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Monroe Land & Livestock Ltd | Lovelock, NV 89419 | $2,724 |
62 | Silver State Farms | Winnemucca, NV 89446 | $2,587 |
63 | Peter S Bing | Los Angeles, CA 90035 | $2,514 |
64 | Bottle Creek Ranch Co Inc | Winnemucca, NV 89445 | $2,505 |
65 | J Kenneth & Alijandra Carpenter | Lovelock, NV 89419 | $2,409 |
66 | Dennis M Cawrse | Battle Mountain, NV 89820 | $2,319 |
67 | Janet Lancaster | Austin, NV 89310 | $2,290 |
68 | June Harrigan | Fallon, NV 89406 | $2,193 |
69 | John & Kathryn Landa | Lovelock, NV 89419 | $2,168 |
70 | Richard Schall | Susanville, CA 96130 | $2,142 |
71 | William Jay Gandolfo | Austin, NV 89310 | $2,072 |
72 | Miller Ranch Inc | Fallon, NV 89406 | $1,900 |
73 | Glenn Bakker | Battle Mountain, NV 89820 | $1,848 |
74 | Jennette Bakker | Battle Mountain, NV 89820 | $1,848 |
75 | Ted & Leah Rookstool | Orovada, NV 89425 | $1,812 |
76 | Nancy Dufrene | Lovelock, NV 89419 | $1,800 |
77 | Villalobos Farms | Orovada, NV 89425 | $1,760 |
78 | Peter Segulja III | Wells, NV 89835 | $1,752 |
79 | K Hugh Montrose | Lovelock, NV 89419 | $1,688 |
80 | Donald Travis | Fallon, NV 89407 | $1,683 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”