Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in 2nd District of Nevada (Rep. Mark Amodei), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 402
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in 2nd District of Nevada (Rep. Mark Amodei) totaled $9,447,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Filippini Ranching Co | Battle Mountain, NV 89820 | $29,626 |
102 | , | $28,836 | |
103 | Kimble Wilkinson Ranch | Mc Dermitt, NV 89421 | $28,505 |
104 | Quilici Livestock, Inc. | Spring Creek, NV 89815 | $28,370 |
105 | Rock Creek Cattle Company LLC | Golconda, NV 89414 | $28,358 |
106 | , | $27,424 | |
107 | Winecup Inc | Oakley, ID 83346 | $27,123 |
108 | Mike Marvel Ranching | Battle Mountain, NV 89820 | $26,683 |
109 | Montgomery Cattle Company LLC | Buhl, ID 83316 | $26,596 |
110 | Shewmaker Bros Inc | Kimberly, ID 83341 | $26,204 |
111 | Vesco Ranch LLC | Winnemucca, NV 89446 | $25,971 |
112 | Bar X Ranch | Paradise Valley, NV 89426 | $25,218 |
113 | Winecup L Cattle LLC | Jerome, ID 83338 | $25,086 |
114 | Estill Ranches Sheep Co LLC | Gerlach, NV 89412 | $24,555 |
115 | Henry V Mcerquiaga | Orovada, NV 89425 | $24,458 |
116 | , | $24,397 | |
117 | Hs Ranch | Paradise Valley, NV 89426 | $24,240 |
118 | Archie Osborne | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $23,937 |
119 | , | $23,087 | |
120 | Star Creek Ranch LLC | Imlay, NV 89418 | $22,912 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”