Livestock Forage Disaster Program in 2nd District of Nevada (Rep. Mark Amodei), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 707

Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in 2nd District of Nevada (Rep. Mark Amodei) totaled $99,098,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Livestock Forage Disaster Program
1995-2023
1John Espil Sheep Co IncSparks, NV 89436$1,226,085
2Alder Creek Denio Ranch LLCDenio, NV 89404$1,142,850
3Gj Livestock LLCMc Dermitt, NV 89421$1,140,042
4Silver Creek Ranch IncAustin, NV 89310$1,115,925
5Pine Forest Land & Stk CoWinnemucca, NV 89446$1,100,196
6T Quarter Circle RanchWinnemucca, NV 89445$1,070,038
7Crawford Cattle LLCWinnemucca, NV 89445$1,024,185
8J Tomera Ranches IncBattle Mountain, NV 89820$996,172
9Mori Ranches LLCTuscarora, NV 89834$989,744
10Goemmer L & L Buffalo Ranch LLCBattle Mountain, NV 89820$985,352
11Glaser Land & Livestock CompanyElko, NV 89801$978,787
12Grass Valley Ranch LLCAustin, NV 89310$965,321
13John Martin OlagarayLodi, CA 95242$957,059
14Pete MarvelParadise Valley, NV 89426$939,171
15John BellParadise Valley, NV 89426$921,259
16Boies Ranch IncWells, NV 89835$914,211
17Harry Ranch LLCElk Grove, CA 95759$904,496
18Flat Creek Ranch General PartnersOrovada, NV 89425$898,122
19El Tejon Sheep CoBakersfield, CA 93380$887,302
20Delong Ranches IncWinnemucca, NV 89445$865,858

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag