Total Conservation Programs in 19th District of New York (Rep. Antonio Delgado), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 156
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 19th District of New York (Rep. Antonio Delgado) totaled $263,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Frank Ciolli | Malba, NY 11357 | $1,173 |
62 | Silmor Associates, LLC | Newfoundland, NJ 07435 | $1,136 |
63 | John T Parrinello | Cornwall, NY 12518 | $1,094 |
64 | Edward F Weber | Bovina Center, NY 13740 | $1,090 |
65 | Richard G Latourette | Sidney Center, NY 13839 | $1,084 |
66 | Robert Latourette | Sidney Center, NY 13839 | $1,068 |
67 | Briggs Heritage Farm LLC | Sidney, NY 13838 | $1,056 |
68 | Jim Groff Quarter Horses | Franklin, NY 13775 | $1,054 |
69 | John Janiszewski | Delhi, NY 13753 | $1,033 |
70 | Lamport Farms | Hobart, NY 13788 | $1,018 |
71 | Eric D Mclaughlin | Hobart, NY 13788 | $996 |
72 | Joseph Fusco | Wading River, NY 11792 | $981 |
73 | Jeffrey Tomasi | London, N6 5 | $971 |
74 | Keith Kaminskas | Park Ridge, NJ 07656 | $929 |
75 | Richard R Toebe | Bloomville, NY 13739 | $902 |
76 | Roger Bolles | Delhi, NY 13753 | $901 |
77 | The Farm At Miller's Crossing LLC | Hudson, NY 12534 | $892 |
78 | Richard & Roger Liddle | Andes, NY 13731 | $866 |
79 | Andrew L Kiraly | Walton, NY 13856 | $859 |
80 | Cheryl Ann Starcher-ceresna | Franklin, NY 13775 | $834 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”