Total Conservation Programs in 19th District of New York (Rep. Antonio Delgado), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 156
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 19th District of New York (Rep. Antonio Delgado) totaled $263,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Schaefer Farm | Deposit, NY 13754 | $459 |
122 | Scott Hymers | Delhi, NY 13753 | $447 |
123 | Lee Marie Burns | Bovina Center, NY 13740 | $444 |
124 | Harvey W Morse | Andes, NY 13731 | $437 |
125 | John S Lamport | Hobart, NY 13788 | $421 |
126 | James A Keator | East Meredith, NY 13757 | $410 |
127 | Mrs Teresa S Keator | East Meredith, NY 13757 | $410 |
128 | Michael R Ross | Oneonta, NY 13820 | $392 |
129 | Walterna Holsteins LLC | Grand Gorge, NY 12434 | $371 |
130 | Bruce Dolph | Walton, NY 13856 | $367 |
131 | Alvaro Dearmas | Sidney Center, NY 13839 | $343 |
132 | Frank De Boer Jr | Franklin, NY 13775 | $342 |
133 | Lafever Excavating | Bovina Center, NY 13740 | $339 |
134 | Cecil C Davis II | Delhi, NY 13753 | $330 |
135 | Carol Gutliph | Delancey, NY 13752 | $318 |
136 | Kevin Gutliph | Delancey, NY 13752 | $318 |
137 | Christine A Cole Dba Broken Spoke Stables | Hobart, NY 13788 | $313 |
138 | Arlene A Schubert | Davenport, NY 13750 | $300 |
139 | Coulter Brook Road LLC | East Hampton, NY 11937 | $296 |
140 | Carlo Izzo | Delhi, NY 13753 | $288 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”