Total Conservation Programs in 21st District of New York (Rep. Elise Stefanik), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 428
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 21st District of New York (Rep. Elise Stefanik) totaled $4,950,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Michael W Trapp | Gouverneur, NY 13642 | $14,493 |
102 | North Woods Properties Inc | Canton, NY 13617 | $14,445 |
103 | Alan & Charles Smith | Fort Covington, NY 12937 | $14,372 |
104 | David S Teele | Lisbon, NY 13658 | $14,352 |
105 | Howard Strader | Waterloo, NY 13165 | $14,100 |
106 | Hubert Durant | Bombay, NY 12914 | $13,920 |
107 | Jaremy Jock | North Lawrence, NY 12967 | $13,762 |
108 | Vernon A Lowery | Hammond, NY 13646 | $13,564 |
109 | Ernest L Jock | Bombay, NY 12914 | $13,500 |
110 | Chapman Bros | Fort Covington, NY 12937 | $13,300 |
111 | Herb Healey | Chateaugay, NY 12920 | $12,732 |
112 | William Harrigan | Chateaugay, NY 12920 | $12,730 |
113 | Kenneth Hilborne | Ogdensburg, NY 13669 | $12,582 |
114 | Daniel W Caster | Canton, NY 13617 | $12,559 |
115 | Danny G Collins Land Worx | Potsdam, NY 13676 | $12,558 |
116 | Roberta Durbin | Bombay, NY 12914 | $12,374 |
117 | Mark L Finley | De Kalb Junction, NY 13630 | $12,140 |
118 | Gerard Spinner | Fort Covington, NY 12937 | $11,856 |
119 | Edward J Wood Jr | East Concord, NY 14055 | $11,845 |
120 | Scott D Laing | Potsdam, NY 13676 | $11,761 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”