Biomass Crop Assistance Program in 21st District of New York (Rep. Elise Stefanik), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 28

Recipients of Biomass Crop Assistance Program from farms in 21st District of New York (Rep. Elise Stefanik) totaled $2,412,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Biomass Crop Assistance Program
1995-2023
1Tom Ed Matt Dan Garland PatrnersMalone, NY 12953$357,774
2Donald L Snyder Jr Logging CorpPotsdam, NY 13676$332,498
3Ward Logging LLCJay, NY 12941$219,910
4Richard's Logging LLCTupper Lake, NY 12986$219,846
5Paul J Mitchell Logging IncTupper Lake, NY 12986$210,315
6Levi Lumber CompanyInlet, NY 13360$172,399
7J & S Logging IncSouth Colton, NY 13687$139,773
8Galusha & Sons LLCQueensbury, NY 12804$114,877
9P M LoggingSaint Regis Falls, NY 12980$109,287
10Chris Parker Trucking And LoggingSaint Regis Falls, NY 12980$75,557
11Thomas J BurkumPotsdam, NY 13676$69,410
12James C Smith LoggingAu Sable Forks, NY 12912$68,782
13Toomey Brothers LoggingPotsdam, NY 13676$64,217
14Joseph RyanChateaugay, NY 12920$54,000
15Malcom FyeDickinson Center, NY 12930$53,449
16American Tree Company IncLake George, NY 12845$38,983
17Perry Wheeler Trucking IncBurke, NY 12917$27,476
18Stannard Pulpwood Sales IncKeeseville, NY 12944$17,098
19James M Peck Logging IncChestertown, NY 12817$12,015
20G & T EnterprisesJohnsburg, NY 12843$10,740

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag