Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 21st District of New York (Rep. Elise Stefanik), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 78

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 21st District of New York (Rep. Elise Stefanik) totaled $748,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2021
21Alan & Charles SmithFort Covington, NY 12937$10,761
22Norco FarmsHopkinton, NY 12965$10,213
23Roger DebyahNorth Bangor, NY 12966$10,149
24Windy Valley FarmEssex, NY 12936$10,133
25Thomas J SchiltzHopkinton, NY 12965$10,092
26Salmon Brook FarmMoira, NY 12957$10,073
27Roger WillinghamConstable, NY 12926$9,357
28Eugene M PoirierNorth Bangor, NY 12966$9,258
29Donald C DanaMoira, NY 12957$8,592
30Kenneth R RousellNorth Bangor, NY 12966$8,459
31Blue Top FarmNorth Bangor, NY 12966$8,355
32Gary P MonicaNorth Bangor, NY 12966$8,309
33Stauffer Farms LLCNicholville, NY 12965$8,181
34Harold J AllenNorth Bangor, NY 12966$7,867
35Whites Dairy Farms LLCNorth Bangor, NY 12966$7,845
36James G MansonFort Covington, NY 12937$7,802
37Donald W CampbellFort Covington, NY 12937$7,731
38Fred LazoreHogansburg, NY 13655$7,238
39Jo-d AcresPrinceton, NJ 08540$6,962
40Mobedick & Associates IncMalone, NY 12953$6,942

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag