Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in 23rd District of New York (Rep. Tom Reed), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 56
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in 23rd District of New York (Rep. Tom Reed) totaled $187,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Peter Zloch | Pine City, NY 14871 | $3,100 |
22 | Mark Harth | Burdett, NY 14818 | $2,987 |
23 | Edward Gates | Montour Falls, NY 14865 | $2,931 |
24 | Earl H Stermer | Erin, NY 14838 | $2,625 |
25 | John Watts Estate | Pine City, NY 14871 | $2,269 |
26 | Kenneth Jaynes | Beaver Dams, NY 14812 | $2,040 |
27 | Wilbur J Vance | Beaver Dams, NY 14812 | $1,725 |
28 | Gary Gaige | Alpine, NY 14805 | $1,725 |
29 | Laurentiu Marian | York, PA 17402 | $1,704 |
30 | Amos M Hilliker | Chemung, NY 14825 | $1,550 |
31 | Archie Larison | Van Etten, NY 14889 | $1,456 |
32 | Thomas H Giles | Lowman, NY 14861 | $1,387 |
33 | Ivan Kiser | Horseheads, NY 14845 | $1,360 |
34 | John Rockwell | Watkins Glen, NY 14891 | $1,333 |
35 | Chateau Frank Inc | Hammondsport, NY 14840 | $1,277 |
36 | Clyde A Knowlton | Pine City, NY 14871 | $1,239 |
37 | Burr Ayr Farms, Ltd. | Trumansburg, NY 14886 | $1,177 |
38 | Stanley Benjamin | Horseheads, NY 14845 | $1,068 |
39 | Wesley Deceased Plate | Montour Falls, NY 14865 | $988 |
40 | Richard O Smith | Watkins Glen, NY 14891 | $970 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”