Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Ohio
(Rep. Brad Wenstrup)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Ohio (Rep. Brad Wenstrup), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,853
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Ohio (Rep. Brad Wenstrup) totaled $68,142,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Roger A Pence | Winchester, OH 45697 | $414,222 |
22 | Delores Hesler | Winchester, OH 45697 | $403,856 |
23 | Chad Armstrong | Seaman, OH 45679 | $390,124 |
24 | John Smiley | Seaman, OH 45679 | $389,347 |
25 | Jeff Brammer | Winchester, OH 45697 | $373,028 |
26 | Dennis Black | Winchester, OH 45697 | $373,025 |
27 | Ramona Stone | Winchester, OH 45697 | $365,988 |
28 | Bret Unger | Peebles, OH 45660 | $338,227 |
29 | Jerry Ball | Peebles, OH 45660 | $336,178 |
30 | Leroy Logan | Morehead, KY 40351 | $324,850 |
31 | Todd B Raines | Seaman, OH 45679 | $324,019 |
32 | Greg Raines | Seaman, OH 45679 | $321,508 |
33 | Jeff Unger | Peebles, OH 45660 | $318,028 |
34 | Roger A Rhonemus | West Union, OH 45693 | $314,305 |
35 | James A Mcclanahan | West Union, OH 45693 | $310,785 |
36 | Gary Kennedy | Seaman, OH 45679 | $308,813 |
37 | Troy Mcclanahan | West Union, OH 45693 | $302,508 |
38 | Deborah Abbott | West Union, OH 45693 | $294,255 |
39 | Ermal Dean Wright | West Union, OH 45693 | $291,833 |
40 | Roger Shupert | Seaman, OH 45679 | $290,122 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”