Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Ohio
(Rep. Brad Wenstrup)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Ohio (Rep. Brad Wenstrup), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 655
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Ohio (Rep. Brad Wenstrup) totaled $2,405,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Todd Ellis | West Union, OH 45693 | $7,011 |
102 | Norman Lee Taylor | Stout, OH 45684 | $6,946 |
103 | Troy Mcclanahan | West Union, OH 45693 | $6,862 |
104 | Marion Lowder | Peebles, OH 45660 | $6,822 |
105 | Blue Creek Farm Limited Liability | West Union, OH 45693 | $6,698 |
106 | Tim Shipley | Winchester, OH 45697 | $6,672 |
107 | Leroy Logan | Morehead, KY 40351 | $6,564 |
108 | Stephen L Douglas | Peebles, OH 45660 | $6,449 |
109 | William V Martin | Peebles, OH 45660 | $6,305 |
110 | Alexander R Newman | Seaman, OH 45679 | $6,224 |
111 | Andrea Wamsley | Winchester, OH 45697 | $6,006 |
112 | James Unger II | West Union, OH 45693 | $5,945 |
113 | Ronald Storer | New Knoxville, OH 45871 | $5,752 |
114 | Dennis Gustin | West Union, OH 45693 | $5,659 |
115 | James A Mcclanahan | West Union, OH 45693 | $5,558 |
116 | Robert P Shipley | Winchester, OH 45697 | $5,538 |
117 | Anthony M Powell | Peebles, OH 45660 | $5,526 |
118 | Jeff Brammer | Winchester, OH 45697 | $5,486 |
119 | Jeffrey R Haywood | Winchester, OH 45697 | $5,450 |
120 | Cheryl K Haywood | Winchester, OH 45697 | $5,417 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”