Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Ohio
(Rep. Brad Wenstrup)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Ohio (Rep. Brad Wenstrup), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 655
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Ohio (Rep. Brad Wenstrup) totaled $2,405,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Donald E Vogler | Winchester, OH 45697 | $2,668 |
182 | Billy D Mccormick | Winchester, OH 45697 | $2,626 |
183 | Chester L Grooms | West Union, OH 45693 | $2,624 |
184 | William Shreffler | Seaman, OH 45679 | $2,597 |
185 | Robert E Morgan | West Union, OH 45693 | $2,585 |
186 | Heather Renee Davis | West Union, OH 45693 | $2,576 |
187 | Helen L Williams | Peebles, OH 45660 | $2,562 |
188 | Brett D Miller | West Union, OH 45693 | $2,541 |
189 | David W Purdin | Winchester, OH 45697 | $2,524 |
190 | John D Mccormick | Seaman, OH 45679 | $2,490 |
191 | Brian K Baldridge | Winchester, OH 45697 | $2,440 |
192 | Steve Hoop | Peebles, OH 45660 | $2,396 |
193 | Noble E Mathews | West Union, OH 45693 | $2,288 |
194 | Janet Gorden Taylor | Mount Orab, OH 45154 | $2,272 |
195 | Harvey R Stanfield | Manchester, OH 45144 | $2,209 |
196 | Tristan J Grooms | Seaman, OH 45679 | $2,183 |
197 | Lawrence Bennett | Blue Creek, OH 45616 | $2,168 |
198 | Chris T Grooms | West Union, OH 45693 | $2,153 |
199 | Debra H Smiley | Winchester, OH 45697 | $2,136 |
200 | David Dugan | Aberdeen, OH 45101 | $2,121 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”