Total Conservation Programs in 5th District of Ohio (Rep. Robert Latta), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,496
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 5th District of Ohio (Rep. Robert Latta) totaled $5,380,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Benjamin Gyde | Mcclure, OH 43534 | $21,730 |
22 | Hal Detray | Defiance, OH 43512 | $21,194 |
23 | Andy Heer | Archbold, OH 43502 | $20,008 |
24 | Nicholas Schappert | Defiance, OH 43512 | $19,962 |
25 | Wldcc LLC | Defiance, OH 43512 | $19,148 |
26 | Brad Schlachter | Defiance, OH 43512 | $18,784 |
27 | Judith Mccalla | Hicksville, OH 43526 | $18,677 |
28 | Shirley A Fry | Montpelier, OH 43543 | $18,407 |
29 | Mildred L Roth | Archbold, OH 43502 | $18,294 |
30 | Christopher R King | Archbold, OH 43502 | $18,169 |
31 | Edward And Carol Nofziger Irrv Trust | Archbold, OH 43502 | $18,161 |
32 | Henry C Schoenhals & Elizabeth Schoenhals Trust | Archbold, OH 43502 | $17,768 |
33 | Jeffrey J Spangler | Oakwood, OH 45873 | $17,215 |
34 | Rolland M Andrews Jr | Oakwood, OH 45873 | $16,964 |
35 | Van Hug | Edgerton, OH 43517 | $16,902 |
36 | Philip L Yoder | Mark Center, OH 43536 | $16,841 |
37 | Stewart Taylor | Hicksville, OH 43526 | $16,528 |
38 | Paul Sharrock | Bryan, OH 43506 | $16,375 |
39 | Ryan G Zeedyk | Hicksville, OH 43526 | $15,982 |
40 | Van Pendleton | Hilton Head, SC 29926 | $15,765 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”